Operations
Verification
Test engineered timber components for bond integrity, structural strength, moisture stability, and compliance before release.
more information
-
Past Projects
Deep dives
-
Delamination Failure Mechanisms
-
Treatment Penetration and Termite Risk
-
Structural Classification and GL28 Explained
Introduction
-
Overview
-
Benefits
-
Woodlam's Forestry Approach
Overview
Structural failure often begins internally. Delamination, weak finger joints, incorrect moisture content, and insufficient treatment penetration may not be visible at first inspection, but they can reduce capacity and shorten service life.
Woodlam verifies dimensional conformity, bond integrity, delamination resistance, moisture content, and treatment penetration before release. Testing aligns with EN 385, EN 408, and EN 14080 references. Where required, additional tropical stress simulation is applied to confirm bond stability under humidity cycling.
Verification reduces hidden failure risk and strengthens compliance documentation for approval, handover, and long-term liability control.
Benefits
Confirm structural accuracy
Dimensional conformity, bond integrity, finger-joint strength, and moisture content are verified before dispatch to confirm alignment with structural documentation.
Remove hidden risks
Testing identifies delamination, inadequate treatment penetration, and internal weakness before installation.
Validate tropical durability
Components are assessed under controlled humidity and heat cycling where required to confirm bond stability and exposure suitability before installation.
Protect project liability
Verification records support permitting, tender review, and professional sign-off. Test results replace assumption with documented evidence.
How It Works
Verification subjects structural components to controlled testing before release. Each step confirms bond integrity, dimensional accuracy, and performance under defined standards.
Step 1 – Perform dimensional and tolerance validation
Tolerance checks confirm conformity with engineering files.
Components are inspected for:
-
Length and profile accuracy
-
Camber and straightness
-
Lamination alignment
-
Precision machining conformity
Output: Dimensional conformity verified against structural documentation.
Step 2 – Conduct bond integrity and delamination testing
Delamination is a critical long-term risk in engineered timber.
Verification may include:
-
Chisel delamination inspection
-
Vacuum–pressure delamination testing
-
Oven-drying delamination testing
-
Finger-joint bending testing
Results are recorded against acceptance criteria defined for the product and exposure classification.
Output: Bond-line and finger-joint reliability verified under simulated stress conditions.
Step 3 – Validate structural strength performance
Testing aligns with recognised references:
-
EN 385: finger-joint strength
-
EN 408: structural timber performance testing
-
EN 14080: glulam requirements
-
Strength class verification (for example GL28, where specified)
Verification may confirm:
-
Bending strength
-
Shear capacity
-
Stiffness and load resistance
Structural capacity is measured before release.
Output: Load-bearing performance verified against specified strength class and design assumptions.
Step 4 – Confirm tropical durability and treatment penetration
Indonesia’s climate requires verification beyond visual checks.
Where specified, verification includes:
-
Curcumin penetration testing for boron-based treatment
-
Treatment absorption depth checks
-
Moisture content confirmation prior to bonding and prior to dispatch
-
Adhesive suitability check against exposure classification
Output: Moisture, treatment penetration, and exposure suitability verified before installation.
Step 5 – Secure traceability and compliance documentation
Testing results are linked to:
-
Production batch records
-
Engineering schedules
-
Component labelling
Documentation may include:
-
Test and inspection records (bond, finger-joint, delamination, dimensional checks)
-
Treatment validation and moisture logs
-
Project-specific compliance pack for handover or export, where required
Traceability remains continuous from Forest intake through manufacturing and verification.
Output: Verified components with an auditable documentation trail linked to batch and project.
Delamination Failure Mechanisms
Delamination is one of the most critical long-term risks in engineered timber.
It occurs when the bonded lamella separates under stress, moisture cycling, or inadequate curing. Delamination is rarely visible at installation. It develops internally over time if bond integrity is compromised.
Verification ensures bond performance under simulated stress before dispatch.
Bond failure can originate from:
-
Incomplete adhesive coverage
-
Insufficient pressing pressure
-
Incorrect open time or curing temperature
-
Contamination of bonding surfaces
-
Inadequate moisture control during lamination
When bonds weaken, shear transfer between lamella reduces. Structural members begin to behave as layered timber instead of a composite unit.
This increases deflection and reduces structural redundancy.
-
EN 14080 defines performance requirements and production control for glued laminated timber.
Verification may include:
-
Delamination resistance under moisture exposure
-
Adhesive bond durability under cyclic stress
-
Minimum shear strength requirements
-
Ongoing production control documentation
Testing simulates humidity cycling and drying stress to confirm bond stability. If delamination exceeds defined limits, the component fails acceptance.
-
Woodlam performs:
-
Vacuum–pressure delamination tests to simulate moisture penetration
-
Oven drying delamination tests to simulate rapid moisture loss
-
Chisel testing to inspect bond-line cohesion
These procedures replicate stress conditions found in tropical climates.
Bond integrity must remain intact under simulated environmental stress.
-
Delamination testing confirms:
-
Reliable shear transfer between lamella
-
Long-term bond stability
-
Reduced structural liability
-
Compliance with recognised standards
Bond integrity is verified before installation.
-
Treatment Penetration and Termite Risk
In tropical climates, biological durability is as critical as structural strength. Insufficient preservative penetration increases risk of termite attack, fungal decay, and long-term degradation. Verification confirms treatment absorption and suitability before release.
Surface treatment alone is insufficient.
If preservative systems do not penetrate to the required depth:
-
Core timber remains vulnerable
-
Termite pathways remain accessible
-
Biological degradation accelerates
-
Service life shortens
Treatment effectiveness is determined by penetration depth and retention, not chemical selection alone.
-
For boron-based systems, verification includes curcumin indicator testing.
This confirms:
-
Penetration depth
-
Uniform distribution
-
Absorption consistency
Boron systems rely on diffusion within timber fibre structure. Moisture equilibrium and density influence penetration.
Absorption must be verified, not assumed.
-
For higher exposure classifications, ACQ treatment may be specified.
Verification confirms:
-
Absorption depth
-
Retention levels
-
Compatibility with structural bonding
-
Suitability for exterior applications
Durability class and exposure classification must align with site conditions.
-
Indonesia’s high humidity and termite prevalence require:
-
Verified penetration
-
Controlled moisture content
-
Compatible adhesive systems
-
Correct detailing at installation
Treatment validation reduces hidden biological risk.
-
Treatment verification supports:
-
Biological protection appropriate to exposure classification
-
Reduced termite and decay risk
-
Extended service life through verified penetration
-
Compliance-ready documentation for handover
Durability is confirmed before installation.
-
Structural Classification and GL28 Explained
Structural classification defines the load-bearing capacity of engineered timber. GL28 is a strength class used in glulam classification. It defines minimum bending strength, stiffness, and density performance thresholds. Classification directly influences span design and structural modelling.
GL28 is a glulam strength class defined under EN 14080 frameworks. It specifies minimum characteristic values for bending strength, stiffness (modulus of elasticity), and density.
Where GL28 is specified, verification supports consistency between modelling assumptions and produced components.
Structural modelling relies on verified strength class.
If classification is overstated:
-
Deflection calculations become inaccurate
-
Bending resistance may be insufficient
-
Safety margins reduce
If classification is understated:
-
Overdesign increases material use
-
Project costs rise unnecessarily
Verification ensures modelling assumptions align with physical performance.
-
Verification includes:
-
EN 385 finger-joint strength testing
-
EN 408 structural performance testing
-
Batch-level bond validation
-
Dimensional conformity checks
Strength class is confirmed through testing, not declared through specification alone.
-
Classification connects:
-
Forest stage material data
-
Engineering modelling assumptions
-
Manufacturing bond integrity
-
Verification performance testing
This continuity reduces structural mismatch across stages.
-
Structural classification verification ensures:
-
Reliable span performance
-
Accurate deflection modelling
-
Compliance with international standards
-
Reduced structural liability
Load-bearing capacity is measured, not assumed.
-
Past Projects
Projects that prove standards alignment, durability assumptions, and performance checks beyond appearance.
Graveyard Canopy – San Diego Hills (2018)
Woodlam’s first application of Eurocode 5 for glulam beam calculation. Nine-metre pressed beams were elevated 50–60 cm above ground to reduce termite exposure. Soil treatment and detailing strategy were integrated into structural design, proving performance-based durability planning.
RC House (2020)
Accoya Timberclad specified for dimensional stability under prolonged skylight heat exposure. Moisture movement coefficients and thermal expansion behaviour were considered to prevent façade warping and joint separation.
Ciasem House (2023)
Precision-installed Accoya Timberline ceiling system with tight joint tolerance and linear alignment across multiple planes. Verification included moisture content calibration before installation to prevent post-installation shrinkage.
Technical Snapshot
Testing Standards
EN 385, EN 408, EN 14080 aligned testing
Structural Classification
GL28 performance threshold verification
Bond Integrity Testing
Multi-stage delamination simulation
Finger-Joint Strength
Bending performance validation
Treatment Penetration
Curcumin-based absorption testing
Moisture Validation
Pre-lamination and pre-dispatch moisture confirmation
Tolerance Confirmation
Dimensional conformity against engineering files
Frequently Asked Questions
Got a question unanswered? Speak to our team.
Was delamination tested under moisture and heat?
Yes. Vacuum–pressure and oven drying delamination tests simulate tropical humidity and rapid moisture loss conditions.
Are finger joints load-tested?
Yes. Finger joint bending tests confirm structural reliability under load.
Is moisture content controlled before lamination?
Yes. Moisture is measured and stabilised before bonding begins.
Can results be traced to my project or batch?
Yes. Verification records are linked to production batch IDs and component labelling. Project-specific documentation can be provided for handover, permitting, or export requirements.
How do I know adhesive systems are climate-suitable?
Adhesive systems are selected during engineering based on exposure classification, then verified during production and testing. Bond-line performance is checked through delamination resistance testing and cure verification before release.
Why is aftercare necessary for timber buildings?
Tropical climates require monitored coating cycles, humidity checks, and seasonal inspections to preserve longevity and structural integrity.